Back

Vantage Data House

U.S. Views on Epstein Disclosure and Responsibility

vantagedatahouse.com N = 1,602 respondents February 25-27, 2026 Poststratified ML estimates

Overview

Key Findings

High-level takeaways from modeled estimates

Note on Methodology

We estimate a machine learning ensemble that predicts opinion as a function of party, geography, age, sex, education, income, religion, race, and contextual variables. We generate predicted probabilities for detailed demographic cells and post-stratify them to the county, congressional district, state house, and state senate levels using turnout-adjusted population weights before aggregating to the national level. Reported differences (e.g., rural vs. urban) reflect differences in predicted support for those populations as they are composed—including their partisan and demographic makeup—rather than simple unweighted survey averages. As a result, rural–urban differences are not strictly ceteris paribus; they partly reflect differences in partisan composition. For ceteris paribus-style comparisons, we report within-group breakdowns and crosstabs (e.g., rural vs. urban within party).

Survey Questions

Topline Results

Two Epstein questions with full response distributions

Demographics

Demographic Breakdown

Explore each question by demographic group

Question 1

Question 1

Question 2

Question 2

Interactive Explorer

Crosstabs Explorer

Enforcement first, investigations second

Question 1

Question 1

Cross-tabulated estimates by two demographic variables

Question 2

Question 2

Cross-tabulated estimates by two demographic variables

Values are weighted poststratified estimates (percent).

Archetypes

Archetypes

View archetype support by question and response category

Geographic

State Ranking

All 51 states ranked with top and bottom tiers highlighted